Building Sand Castles

Written by Drew on May 15th, 2007

One of the most memorable parts of Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount was a lesson on foundations.

Everyone then who hears these words of mine and does them will be like a wise man who built his house on the rock. And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house, but it did not fall, because it had been founded on the rock. And everyone who hears these words of mine and does not do them will be like a foolish man who built his house on the sand. And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell, and great was the fall of it (Mt. 7:24-27).

Jesus sums up the responses to his message into two categories. Some people hear his Word and choose to follow it; some people hear it and choose to disobey it. We must recognize that Jesus intended for these categories to be broad, since everyone’s experience is slightly different. One guy heard the truth and rejected it because it confronted preconceived ideas; another ignored it because of the hypocrisy of a messenger; another exchanged it for false religion. In the other column, some are raised in the church to obey; some come out of false teaching; others are brought to their senses by a near-death experience. There may only be two foundations–one made of sand and the other made of rock–but the structures we build on these foundations come in all varieties.


Most of us think of the foolish man as a person who simply hears God’s Word and decides to go his own way. But this is only one example. There are many possibilities.

Bobby Duncan related another type of fool.

It is significant that false teachers in the church generally consider themselves to be far wiser and much more knowledgeable than the rest of us. Like the man who builds his house on the sand feels it is foolish to waste so much time and expense laying a good foundation, so the false teacher in the church does not want to be bothered with having to lay a good foundation. He just wants to get the superstructure as large and built as quickly as possible. He scoffs at those who are concerned about a good and solid foundation; he considers himself their intellectual superior, and boasts of his own accomplishments (The Vigil, “Building on the Sand,” September 1992, p. 66).

It is not uncommon to hear criticism aimed at brethren who show concern over doctrinal matters. “They’re wasting time and energy on futile arguments while more important matters demand our attention,” they say. “The church won’t grow like this!” Do they really believe the church will experience real growth without doctrine? If so, they have never read the Parable of the Sower (Lk. 8:11). For a house to stand it must be built on a solid foundation, and God reveals this foundation in the New Testament. Neglecting the foundation is not a good church growth strategy; it is a fool’s errand. The wise man built his house on the rock of the doctrine of Christ.

Experts have revealed that the devastation Hurricane Katrina brought to New Orleans was in part due to a poorly designed levee system. The levees bordering the New Orleans metro area were not designed to withstand the winds and the waves of a storm like Hurricane Katrina. What were the architects thinking? Perhaps they thought the storm would never come.

Perhaps there are Christians who overlook important fundamentals because, in their hearts, they really don’t believe a storm is coming. But Jesus did not leave them without a warning: “And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell, and great was the fall of it.”

 

2 Comments so far ↓

  1. jwoods says:

    Drew,

    While I agree with you to some degree, I must say that I’ve encountered these so-called “fools” on both the “progressive” and “conservative” extremes. There is guilt on both sides when it comes to criticizing or excluding the other side over accusations of spiritual immaturity, intellectual inferiority, etc. I would hesitate to paint just the “progressive” extreme or just the “conservative” extreme with the brush you’re using.

    Personally, some of the absolute strongest, most faithful, devout Christians I know happen to be to the left of where I stand on some doctrinal issues, while others of them are further to the right of me. Whether to the left or the right, they’re the Christians who are more focused on service and evangelism than they are on argumentation and debate.

    Josh Woods

  2. Drew Kizer says:

    If you’ll go back and read the post, you’ll notice that I was careful not to name an extreme. I only questioned those who ridicule others for stressing “doctrinal matters” and “fundamentals.”

    By definition, a “fundamental” does not indicate an extreme, although many people are quick to identify it with the “conservative” branch of politics and religion. Fundamentals are the essential parts. You cannot have a church without what is fundamental to it. Therefore, when I speak of “fundamentals” I am speaking about those things that form the very basis of Christianity (Eph. 4:4-6; Heb. 6:1-2).

    I agree with your point about the guilt on both extremes. That’s why Christians ought to strive for moderation and waver neither to the right hand nor to the left.

    But you don’t have to jettison service and evangelism in order to promote doctrinal soundness. What is evangelism without doctrine? It is a sales pitch without a product. The gospel is God’s power for salvation (Rom. 1:16). Without it, we cannot win souls.

Leave a Comment